Current:Home > FinanceAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -Clarity Finance Guides
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-22 01:02:40
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (8)
Related
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Pro-Palestinian protests reach some high schools amid widespread college demonstrations
- Abortion is still consuming US politics and courts 2 years after a Supreme Court draft was leaked
- Senators want limits on the government’s use of facial recognition technology for airport screening
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Columbia University student journalists had an up-close view for days of drama
- North Carolina Republicans seek hundreds of millions of dollars more for school vouchers
- Four players suspended after Brewers vs. Rays benches-clearing brawl
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- An abortion rights initiative in South Dakota receives enough signatures to make the ballot
Ranking
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- Prince William gives rare health update about Princess Kate amid her cancer diagnosis
- The 10 Best e.l.f. Products That Work as Well (or Better) Than The High-End Stuff
- 'A Man in Full' review: Tom Wolfe Netflix series is barely a glass half empty
- Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
- Score a Hole in One for Style With These Golfcore Pieces From Lululemon, Athleta, Nike, Amazon & More
- How Kelly Ripa and Mark Consuelos Celebrated 28th Anniversary After His Kiss Confession
- For ex-Derby winner Silver Charm, it’s a life of leisure and Old Friends at Kentucky retirement farm
Recommendation
Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
Medicaid expansion discussions could fall apart in Republican-led Mississippi
Fire severely damages a Los Angeles County fire station
Luxury jewelry maker Cartier doesn’t give stuff away, but they pretty much did for one man in Mexico
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
Time's money, but how much? Here's what Americans think an hour of their time is worth
Police sweep onto UCLA campus, remove pro-Palestinian encampment: Live updates
Horoscopes Today, May 1, 2024