Current:Home > MarketsAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -Clarity Finance Guides
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-26 06:05:06
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (72266)
Related
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- Chris Hemsworth and Elsa Pataky's Kids Are Their Spitting Image in Red Carpet Appearance
- Reggie Bush was at his LA-area home when 3 male suspects attempted to break in
- Fed official broke ethics rules but didn’t violate insider trading laws, probe finds
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- All the Couples Who Made the 2024 MTV VMAs a Red Carpet Date Night
- 2024 MTV VMAs: Suki Waterhouse Shares Sweet Update on Parenthood With Robert Pattinson
- 2024 MTV VMAs: Flavor Flav Crowns Jordan Chiles With This Honor After Medal Controversy
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Get Ahead of Spooky Season: Here Are 15+ Easy Halloween Costumes You Can Buy Right Now
Ranking
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- Taylor Swift endorsed Kamala Harris. Donald Trump says he prefers Brittany Mahomes. Why?
- Abortions are down under Florida’s 6-week ban but not by as much as in other states, study says
- The Dave Grohl new baby drama is especially disappointing. Here's why.
- What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
- WNBA players criticize commissioner for downplaying social media vitriol
- 2024 VMAs Red Carpet: Taylor Swift's Bondage-Inspired Look Is Giving Reputation Vibes
- CLIMATE GLIMPSE: Wildfires plague U.S. West and Brazil, Yagi rampages in Vietnam
Recommendation
Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
Libertarian candidates for Congress will be left off Iowa ballots after final court decision
Hidden photo of couple's desperate reunion after 9/11 unearthed after two decades
How Taylor Swift Surpassed Beyoncé’s MTV VMAs Record
How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
Why Travis Kelce Didn't Join Taylor Swift at the 2024 MTV VMAs
2024 VMAs: Miranda Lambert Gives Glimpse Inside Delicious Romance With Husband Brendan McLoughlin
VMAs 2024 winners list: Taylor Swift, Eminem, Ariana Grande compete for video of the year